Scientific program

The scientific committee has worked hard to put together an exciting program consisting of 6 workshops, 12 platform presentations and 43 posters. The review process implied 32 teams of a young and an experienced reviewer that read 19 abstracts on average. These reviews were then normalized for each team into a z-score (average 0 and unit standard deviation) to balance the impact of each reviewer. All papers got 7 to 9 reviews, guaranteeing a good review process.